oi William!!

i thought i had read mikerowe.com was already taken

--

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ Help me fight to keep my son in the US ]-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ http://keepmysoninthe.us ]-=

Thursday, January 22, 2004, 2:42:53 PM, you wrote:

WHB> You're right, M$ does not have a trademark on the word "soft" but they
WHB> *do* have a trademark in Microsoft. And this brings to mind the only
WHB> problem I have with this case. Mike Rowe used MikeRoweSoft instead of
WHB> MikeRoweSoftware or MikeRoweDesign or any other clever name that
WHB> would/could advertise his web design skills (MikeRoweWeb,
WHB> MikeRoweKickAssWebCreationPortfolio). He deliberately chose a name that
WHB> sounds phonetically like Microsoft.

WHB> Why *not* simply choose MikeRowe.com?

WHB> Now, I don't believe that M$ should have come down on this kid with both
WHB> boots like they did and I don't think there is truly a case of
WHB> copyright/trademark infringement here, but I do think that Mike Rowe
WHB> could have used better judgement, and I believe his true intention
WHB> despite what he might be saying was to engender a reaction from Redmond.

WHB> And he got one...

WHB> my $0.02

WHB> will

WHB> Matthew Small wrote:

>> Hmmm... so you're saying he can't use the word "soft"  I thought
>> Microsoft had a trademark on "Microsoft", not "soft".  
>>
>> - Matt Small
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Bushy
>>   To: CF-Community
>>   Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:11 AM
>>   Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>>
>>   Not at all as long as its www.mikerowe.com
>>
>>   --Original Message Text---
>>   From: Matthew Small
>>   Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:51:21 -0500
>>
>>   You have a problem with a person looking to make a buck from his own
>> name?
>>
>>   - Matt Small
>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>     From: Bushy
>>     To: CF-Community
>>     Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:33 AM
>>     Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>>
>>     Well I do!
>>
>>     --Original Message Text---
>>     From: Matthew Small
>>     Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:36:39 -0500
>>
>>     You're right, he knew it might get someone's attention and he
>> wanted to make a buck from it.  I don't have a problem with that.
>>
>>     -Matt Small
>>       ----- Original Message -----
>>       From: Schuster, Steven
>>       To: CF-Community
>>       Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:25 AM
>>       Subject: RE: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>>
>>       The kid probably knew it would get attention. Are people so
>> stupid to think
>>       stuff like this doesn't go unnoticed?
>>
>>       -----Original Message-----
>>       From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>       Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:57 AM
>>       To: CF-Community
>>       Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>>
>>       What's surprising to me is how virulently angry you are with
>> this kid.  
>>       It's not like he went around a neighborhood breaking car windows or
>>       kicking dogs or something.  He's merrily tweaking a gigantic,
>> clumsy
>>       corporation to see what happens.  Why not?  Is Microsoft now an
>>       untouchable, universally loved entity that no patriotic American
>> should
>>       dare make fun of?  Would you suggest we prostrate ourselves
>> before our
>>       right-honorable corporate masters now, or should we wait until
>> it's part
>>       of the EULA?
>>
>>       Personally, I like the fact that he was able to not only elicit a
>>       response from the Beast From Redmond, but also caused them to
>> seriously
>>       embarass themselves in the process, as they're currently trying to
>>       extricate themselves from the whole brouhaha right now:
>>
>>       http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5143614.html?tag=nefd_pop
>>       <http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5143614.html?tag=nefd_pop>
>>
>>       MS can throw their corporate weight behind fighting piracy and
>> crackers
>>       and virus writers all they want.  They'd also have a much
>> stronger case
>>       if "MikeRoweSoft" were actually, say, putting out an operating
>> system or
>>       an Office suite or an incredibly shitty web server, but even they
>>       realize now it was a mistake to even bother with this.
>>
>>       - Jim
>>
>>       Bushy wrote:
>>
>>       >No. Just a little puke.
>>       >
>>       >--Original Message Text---
>>       >From: Tim Heald
>>       >Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:47:45 -0500
>>       >
>>       >satire?  hello?  Fair use?
>>       >  -----Original Message-----
>>       >  From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>       >  Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:00 AM
>>       >  To: CF-Community
>>       >  Subject: re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>>       >
>>       >  Hi all,
>>       >
>>       >  Whats your thoughts on this frigg'in puke in British Columbia
>> CANADA
>>       >trying to monopolize on www.mikerowesoft.com.?
>>       >
>>       >  To be fair to MS it is copyright infringement.
>>       >
>>       >  http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.html
>>       <http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.html>  
>>       >
>>
>>         _____
>>
WHB>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to