major forehead smackings. okokok you can't update on a CD, I am in worse shape than i thought...

> lol i was expecting an answer!  I am assuming the database will be
> constantly read/written.  How do you use a database on a CD as a
> backend??  I mean it sounds technically impractical/impossible, unless
> u are just tlaking about plain good ol backing up on a CD.
>
> This is the best thing to do.  Have the database on its own server
> (separate from the coldfusion server), and have it only connected to
> the CF server, but not searchable on the network.  I guess u have to
> mess with the subnet mask settings (i'm talking out of my butt, butt i
> think it makes sense).  Also change the port it uses.  I think SQL
> Server uses port 1433 by default.
>
> and thirdly, hire me to stand in front of it and kick butt on demand
> :)
  
> ----- Original Message -----
  
> From: dana tierney
  
> To: CF-Community
  
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:15 PM
  
> Subject: Re: HIPAA, arrrggggh
>
>
  
> good question. Looking for a way to low-end this. I've had an access
> db on a floppy, but it was empty.... but if I send it to my hard drive
> that is even more insecure than the commercial host, right? I'd have
> to learn firewalls really really quick once my DSL order goes though...
>
  
> which might be a good idea anyway, but so are a lot of the other
> things I need to do.
>
  
> Dana
>
  
> > How do u maintain a database on a CD?   Are you just tlaking about a
>
  
> > backup?
   
>
  
> > ----- Original Message -----
   
>
  
> > From: dana tierney
   
>
  
> > To: CF-Community
   
>
  
> > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:59 PM
   
>
  
> > Subject: Re: HIPAA, arrrggggh
  
> >
  
> >
   
>
  
> > goodie, my proposed upgrade needs revision. I am sure the current
  
> > system is even less compliant. Just for giggles, suppose the board
  
> > decides they can't afford the colocated server etc... if I were to
  
> > maintain a database on a cd (to take an ultra-lowtech approach) and
>
  
> > that CD is kept in a medical office (I suppose I could find a way to
>
  
> > lock it up too ) then what do ppl think? Recognizing of course that
>
  
> > none of you are lawyers. But it would seem to restrict access to one
>
  
> > person... kills the heck out of my disaster planning but that's
  
> > another story.
   
>
  
> > Any further opinions?
  
> >
   
>
  
> > Dana
  
> >
   
>
  
> > >That depends on how the database is hosted.
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >If you are colocated somewhere using a dedicated server and
  
> > appropriate
   
>
  
> > >security measures are in place, including restricted physical
> access
  
> > to
   
>
  
> > >the box, then yes, you might be in compliance.
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >If you are hosting with a company on a shared server, or they
  
> > install
   
>
  
> > >patches, big fixes, etc. themselves, you are definitely not in
   
>
  
> > >compliance.
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >Essentially, to host with a commercial vendor, you need to pretend
>
  
> > you
   
>
  
> > >don't have one.
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >M
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >-----Original Message-----
   
>
  
> > >From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
>
  
> > >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:59 PM
   
>
  
> > >To: CF-Community
   
>
  
> > >Subject: HIPAA, arrrggggh
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >ok we are having a huge flap over HIPAA compliance, has anyone
> here
   
>
  
> > >previously researched this topic?
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >My burning question: If I have patient data in a SQL or mySQL
  
> > database
   
>
  
> > >on a commercial host, is this adequate security for HIPAA
> purposes?
   
>
  
> > >Authentication is required for the hosting account and for the
  
> > database
   
>
  
> > >itself.
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >Anyone have any resources on this?
   
>
  
> > >
   
>
  
> > >Thanks
   
>
  
> > >Dana
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to