I'd fill the envelope with dog crap and a note: "stop sending me crap, and
Ill stop sending you crap". Now that would be funny.... Until you got
arrested of course.  :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:45 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: spam snail mail
>
> Not a bad Idea... never thought of it
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:37 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: spam snail mail
>
>
> The difference being with junk mail is that the mailer has to
> pay for it,
> even at bulk mail prices that costs a lot more than electronic spam.
>
> Besides do what I do, whenever there's a prepaid reply envelope in the
> package, send it back to the mailer, empty. They still have
> to pay for it.
> If enough people do that they will get the message.
>
> larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:30 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: spam snail mail
> >
> >
> > Too bad the big fat sausage mits of the government would not
> > intervene with unsolicited snail mail. Everyday I go home to
> > throw away about 10 pieces of junk mail in my mailbox.... now
> > that is an area that needs to be regulated!!
> >  
> > Lets hear some thoughts on this!
> >  
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
>   _____  
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to