Does this mean that this stuff stopped when he found out about it? It does make some difference, in my mind. But... if no action was taken...

Dana

Go on and close your eyes
It shouldn't bother you.

M. Etheridge

>Interesting is that Rumsfield paid a personal visit to the Prison in question
>during the month of September 2003, and the atrocities were supposed to have
>taken place during September through December, and Rumsfiled's testimony before
>Congress he admitted he knew about the complaints in January.  Supposedly the
>investigation started then, but no action of any kind was taken against anyone
>until the photos were released and publicized in May 2004.  And he has the gall
>to state that the worst is yet to come.
>
>To me not only should Rumsfield resign, but the entire Joint Chiefs should be
>placed under Courts Marshal as well.  It won't happen, of course, because just a
>few low level enlisted will be tossed to the Lions.  Did anyone notice that the
>MPs serving as guards were actually Policemen in private life?
>
>
>  I think they were under orders. I also think that this does not excuse them.
>But not everyone has the backbone to stand up to authority. I am more concerned
>with the oft-repeated mantra on the networks that this represents the actions of
>a few.
>
>  Dana
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to