#164: Simple Geometries in CF
-----------------------------+------------------------------
  Reporter:  whiteaker       |      Owner:  cf-conventions@…
      Type:  enhancement     |     Status:  new
  Priority:  medium          |  Milestone:
 Component:  cf-conventions  |    Version:
Resolution:                  |   Keywords:  geometry
-----------------------------+------------------------------

Comment (by davidhassell):

 Hi Tim,

 My motivation came from considering how the simple geometries could fit
 into the CF data model (CFDM).

 In the CFDM, coordinates and their bounds are bundled up into a single
 construct (the "auxiliary coordinate construct" in this case). In the
 usual case, matching coordinates with their bounds is unambiguous, via the
 `bounds` attribute. The node coordinates are essentially bounds (albeit
 complex ones) to the coordinates, so I was looking to extend the
 definition of coordinate bounds to allow for these geometries. For this to
 work, I was looking for a similarly robust way of pairing up coordinates
 with their node coordinates (i.e. "bounds"). We can't rely on standard
 names, for example, because they are optional; nor units, for example,
 because they could be the same for both  X and Y coordinates.

 I hope that I'm making sense,

 David

--
Ticket URL: <https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/164#comment:12>
CF Metadata <http://cf-convention.github.io/>
CF Metadata

Reply via email to