Dear Christiane, Jonathan and all, atmosphere_number_content_of_X (new physical parameter) ****************************** atmosphere_number_content_of_cloud_droplets atmosphere_number_content_of_ice_crystals atmosphere_number_content_of_aerosol_particles
use of the plural atmosphere_mass_content_of *************************** atmosphere_mass_content_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol atmosphere_mass_content_of_dust_dry_aerosol atmosphere_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol atmosphere_mass_content_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol atmosphere_mass_content_of_water_in_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_expressed_as_sulfur_dry_aerosol _in_air ******* mass_fraction_of_formaldehyde_in_air mass_fraction_of_methyl_hydroperoxide_in_air mass_fraction_of_carbon_monoxide_in_air mass_fraction_of_hydrogen_peroxide_in_air mass_fraction_of_sulfuric_acid_in_air mass_fraction_of_nitric_acid_in_air mass_fraction_of_hydroperoxyl_in_air mass_fraction_of_dinitrogen_pentoxide_in_air mass_fraction_of_nitrogen_monoxide_in_air mass_fraction_of_nitrogen_dioxide_in_air mass_fraction_of_hydroxide_in_air mass_concentration_ _in_air (old mass_concentration_ _in_air_of_atmosphere_layer) ******************************************* I would delete _of_atmosphere_layer and add dry_aerosol mass_concentration_of_pm2p5_dry_aerosol_in_air mass_concentration_of_pm1_dry_aerosol_in_air mass_concentration_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_in_air mass_concentration_of_dust_dry_aerosol_in_air mass_concentration_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol_in_air mass_concentration_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol_in_air mass_concentration_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_in_air > _in_air_of_atmosphere_layer > *************************** Jonathan wrote 12/03/2008: >For consistency with other names, these would be > aerosol_asymmetry_parameter_of_atmosphere_layer > atmosphere_aerosol_asymmetry_parameter >although (as I've said before) I think maybe we should (for all such names) >just have the second variant, and distinguish between them by the presence or >absence of a vertical coordinate variable. I agree. Assuming an agreement I would delete this _in_air_of_atmosphere_layer list in my proposal. > mass_fraction_of_ozone_in_air_of_atmosphere_layer > mass_fraction_of_nitrogen_dioxide_in_air_of_atmosphere_layer > mass_fraction_of_nitrogen_monoxide_in_air_of_atmosphere_layer > mass_fraction_of_carbon_monoxide_in_air_of_atmosphere_layer > mass_fraction_of_sulfur_dioxide_in_air_of_atmosphere_layer > Why do you change the unit from kg to ug? I like to say that ug is the typical and kg could be the canonical unit. And my question is: Does udunit support ug? Best wishes, Heinke _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
