Dear Christiane, Jonathan, Luca and all Same precedure as tendency email.
forcing ********** toa_instantaneous_shortwave_forcing_due_to_aerosol_assuming_clear_sky toa_instantaneous_shortwave_forcing_due_to_aerosol surface_instantaneous_shortwave_forcing_due_to_aerosol_assuming_clear_sky surface_instantaneous_shortwave_forcing_due_to_aerosol toa_instantaneous_longwave_forcing_due_to_aerosol_assuming_clear_sky toa_instantaneous_longwave_forcing_due_to_ambient_aerosol surface_instantaneous_longwave_forcing_due_to_ambient_aerosol_assuming_clear_sky surface_instantaneous_longwave_forcing_due_to_ambient_aerosol >the last 3 for ambient or dry aerosol? ambient rad the units are dimensionless ********************************* atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_sulfate_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_dust_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_particulate_organic_matter_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_sulfate_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_seasalt_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_water_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_black_carbon_ambient_aerosol _in_ deleted atmosphere_optical_thickness (mode) ******************************************* atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_mode_ambient_aerosol or atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_soluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_mode_dry_aerosol or atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_insoluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_mode_ambient_aerosol or atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_soluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_mode_dry_aerosol or atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_insoluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_mode_ambient_aerosol or atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_soluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_mode_dry_aerosol or atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_insoluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness (mode) ******************************************* atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_mode_ambient_aerosol or atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_soluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_mode_dry_aerosol or atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_accumulation_insoluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_mode_ambient_aerosol or atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_soluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_mode_dry_aerosol or atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_coarse_insoluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_mode_ambient_aerosol or atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_soluble_mode_ambient_aerosol atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_mode_dry_aerosol or atmosphere_absorption_optical_thickness_due_to_aitken_insoluble_mode_ambient_aerosol >Discussion on the vague definition of these modes: >Use of scalar coordinate: For PM10 we agreed on the explicitly defining >a name for it, as Jonathan wrote in his email from 18/11. If I remember >correctly the previous discussion, we said that this would only be done >for very common names, otherwise scalar coordinates would be used. The >modes you are mentioning are indeed very common names, so a >standard-name should be defined. >I think it is however impossible to prescribe the definition in CF as >people use different limits in their model. Would it be possible to >request the exact definition in the comment of this name? under discussion > atmosphere_aerosol_extinction_cross_section_per_particle >Why per particle? I guess in a model you would have this quantity for >the average of particles in a grid box. If it refers to a single >particle or to the whole population cannot be part of the standard_name >but must be defined as a cell measure. Luca should comment this. >> aerosol_asymmetry_parameter >> atmosphere_aerosol_refractive_index_imaginary_part >> atmosphere_aerosol_refractive_index_real_part >> atmosphere_aerosol_single_scattering_albedo >I think it would be important to distinguish between dry and ambient >aerosol? Luca should comment this. list of _of_atmosphere_layer which could be deleted. (see Jonathan's email): ******************************************************* aerosol_asymmetry_parameter_of_atmosphere_layer aerosol_refractive_index_imaginary_part_of_atmosphere_layer aerosol_refractive_index_real_part_of_atmosphere_layer aerosol_single_scattering_albedo_of_atmosphere_layer atmosphere_aerosol_extinction_cross_section_per_particle_of_atmosphere_layer Best wishes Heinke _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
