Dear Alison and Pierre I have one late comment on these C-cycle names, about this one:
> 1) products_of_land_use_change_carbon_content >From the discussion I understand what it means and it is well-defined. However as an English phrase I found it opaque. Although not quite systematic, would it be OK to turn it round, making it carbon_content_of_products_of_land_use_change There are other instances where we have alternative syntaxes X_Y and Y_of_X, depending on how long X is! The difficulty with understanding the above phrase is that it is unclear how much of it "products_of" applies to. Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
