Hi all,
I'm getting confused now.
I understood Alison last proposal as keeping only one name :

surface_upward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_anthropogenic_emission;
 kg m-2 s-1
surface_upward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_emission_from_fossil_fuel_combustion;
 kg m-2 s-1.

Philip's mail, seemed to imply that both names could be used as he liked Alison's distinction...

Could you clarify what the final decision?

For info, yes the data do include aircraft, chimneys,... emissions as these data are derived from country based reporting of fossil fuel trades. Hence the aircraft emissions from US carriers are in the US numbers and hence assigned on the US territory. This might be OK for US as most of the flight are domestic, but I'm sure this is 99.9 % wrong for Belgium ;-). Saying emissions are a vertical integral here would imply that planes are only flying up and down !

Anyway, I will leave with either or definition (you'll just have to explain what the "tendency" one mean to non-chemists...)

Best
Pierre



On 22/09/2010 17:28, Cameron-smith, Philip wrote:
Hi All,

Even if the dataset doesn't have vertical information, if it includes aircraft 
emissions then the physical quantity it is quantifying is the vertical integral 
rather than the surface emission.  In which case I would favour 
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_

If there are no aircraft in the data, then do smoke stacks produce 'surface 
emissions'?  An interesting question that could be debated.  Hence, another 
advantage of tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_ is that it makes the question 
moot.

BTW, FWIW, I note that the closest related standard name already in the table 
specifies the downward direction 
(surface_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon).

On a different note, I like Alison's distinction between

tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_..._due_to_anthropogenic_emission

and

surface_upward_mass_flux_of_..._due_to_anthropogenic_emission

Perhaps we should cross-reference such standard names in their descriptions to 
help future users?

Best wishes,

      Philip

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith,  [email protected],  Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:cf-metadata-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pierre Friedlingstein
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CMIP5 carbon cycle standard names

Alison,
I see your point.
As far as I know the anthropogenic emissions data will be surface
fluxes. Data are based on country level consumption of fossil fuel,
they don't have the info on where in the air it is released...
Pierre

     On 22/09/2010 13:04, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Pierre,

My thinking here was that 'anthropegenic emissions' (which presumably
include fossil fuel emissions) and 'fossil fuel' emissions themselves
do not necessarily always occur at the earth's surface.  For example,
emissions from tall chimneys and aircraft may occur at many levels in
the atmosphere.  It was not clear to me that these particular
quantities in the CMIP5 tables are intended only to account for
surface emissions.
If that is the case, then we certainly need to make it clear and I
agree with your suggestion to label them as surface fluxes. So
instead
of introducing


tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_car
bo n_due_to_anthropogenic_emission; kg m-2 s-1

tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_car
bo n_due_to_emission_from_fossil_fuel_combustion; kg m-2 s-1

I will add

surface_upward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_
an
thropogenic_emission; kg m-2 s-1

surface_upward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_
em ission_from_fossil_fuel_combustion; kg m-2 s-1.

OK?

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                          Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre    Fax: +44 1235 446314
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory          Email:
[email protected]
Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.



-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre Friedlingstein [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 21 September 2010 16:41
To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,SSTD)
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CMIP5 carbon cycle standard names

Hi Alison,
Just wondering, why are the first two variables below named as
"tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of..."
while all others are named as  "surface_upward_mass_flux_of_ ..."
Any reason ?
I know the "tendency..." is used for other chemical species... But

here

for CO2 variables, I think intra-consistency should be favoured. No
?
Best
Pierre

On 21/09/2010 13:40, [email protected] wrote:

Dear Jonathan and Pierre,

Thank you both for your comments on the CMIP5 carbon cycle names.
Looking back through this thread I think we have resolved all the
outstanding issues and so the following names are now accepted for
inclusion in the standard name table:



tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_ca
r

bo n_due_to_anthropogenic_emission; kg m-2 s-1


tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_ca
r

bo n_due_to_emission_from_fossil_fuel_combustion; kg m-2 s-1
surface_upward_mass_flux_of_carbon_due_to_natural_emission;     kg m-

2

s-1
atmosphere_mass_of_carbon_dioxide; kg
carbon_content_of_products_of_land_use_change; kg m-2


surface_upward_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_emis
s

io n_from_fires_excluding_land_use_change; kg m-2 s-1


surface_upward_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_emis
s

io
n_from_grazing; kg m-2 s-1


surface_upward_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_emis
s

io
n_from_crop_harvesting; kg m-2 s-1


surface_net_upward_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_
e

mi ssion_from_anthropogenic_land_use_change; kg m-2 s-1


surface_net_downward_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_t
o

_p

hotosynthesis_and_respiration_and_fires_including_land_use_change;

kg
m-2 s-1
carbon_flux_into_soil_from_litter; kg m-2 s-1
carbon_flux_into_soil_from_vegetation_excluding_litter; kg m-2 s-1
leaf_carbon_content; kg m-2 wood_carbon_content; kg m-2
root_carbon_content; kg m-2
carbon_content_of_miscellaneous_living_matter; kg m-2 (N.B.
'miscellaneous' means carbon content of living matter apart from

those

individually named in the preceding three items)
wood_debris_carbon_content; kg m-2 surface_litter_carbon_content;
kg
m-2 subsurface_litter_carbon_content; kg m-2
fast_soil_pool_carbon_content; kg m-2

medium_soil_pool_carbon_content;

kg m-2 slow_soil_pool_carbon_content; kg m-2


surface_upward_carbon_flux_due_to_plant_respiration_for_biomass_growt
h

;
kg m-2 s-1


surface_upward_carbon_flux_due_to_plant_respiration_for_biomass_maint
e

na
nce; kg m-2 s-1
net_primary_productivity_of_carbon_accumulated_in_leaves; kg m-2 s-
1
net_primary_productivity_of_carbon_accumulated_in_wood; kg m-2 s-1
net_primary_productivity_of_carbon_accumulated_in_roots; kg m-2 s-1


surface_net_downward_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_t
o

_p

hotosynthesis_and_respiration_and_fires_excluding_land_use_change;

kg
m-2 s-1.

To cope with the various fractional vegetation coverage quantities

we

will use the existing standard name area_fraction and introduce new
entries of primary_evergreen_trees, secondary_deciduous_trees,
secondary_evergreen_trees, C3_plant_functional_types,
C4_plant_functional_types into the area_type table.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                          Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre    Fax: +44 1235 446314
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory          Email:

[email protected]

Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.




<<attachment: P_Friedlingstein.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to