> The statement of precedence is intended to resolve problems if they are > detected. Hence I don't think we need to change the convention to achieve the > aim stated (Allow CRS WKT to represent the CRS without requiring comparison > with grid mapping Parameters), if I've understood it correctly. It's already > OK.
@JonathanGregory - does this mean you approve of the proposed wording change? If everyone approves of the wording change, then we could re-purpose the meeting to another CRS WKT topic, such as some issues you have mentioned in your post. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/222#issuecomment-642682547 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.
