I agree that the data-producer should be the best authority on what was intended. However, knowing that doesn't give the data-user an immediate solution to an inconsistency. I think the current wording (the precedence of CF metadata over WKT) makes sense, since this is a CF dataset. As Karl says, that default also gives an incentive to the data-producer to ensure consistency. However, I think it's also fine to recommend contacting the data-producer.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/222#issuecomment-642749222 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
