Dear @JonathanGregory I like "domain topology". (I'll carry on using ?? below so as not to normailise yet)
> I suggest that the penultimate paragraph should begin, "A domain that has no > ?? topology construct, including domains with more than one domain axis > construct" I don't think that's right. A domain has as many ?? topologies as there are domain axis subset combinations. For example, a domain with three domain axes has six ?? topologies. The three that apply to two or more domain axes are always implicit, and each of the three that apply to only one domain axis is either implicit or else is explicity provided with a ?? topology construct. A common case will be a domain with two domain axes - one for time and one for UGRID cells - but there can still be a ?? topology for the UGRID axis. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/153*issuecomment-881363097__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!iUtsftWtIWYEkjcANCiDcuqeUibCoB3QsO4nWGpev4DmXeru4FqdsTYmbw8Sv35i_TNnZCmqMaQ$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
