Dear David It's a good point that there may be domain axes which aren't involved in the topology. Thanks for the correction. We can supply a ?? topology construct provided it refers to a single domain axis (the UGRID case). I'm not sure there would be more than topology for a domain, although I agree it's conceivable, but I think that's in the realm of speculation, since we don't currently have a use-case for describing the situation with more than one domain axis involved in the topology.
Best wishes Jonathan -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/153*issuecomment-881400525__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!jKWZ51HoixEz5djWST4YyfJngt2th3x9y2FGQIgn80lQhtMEjv9yHgvcepMu-iXIBxJkpC0NN7c$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.
