My understanding is that the California Digital Libraries (CDL) was of the two founders of DataCite, and at some point moved/migrated the EZID resources to DataCite for external users. I access directly through CDL, and @ethanrd probably access through EZID/DataCite. I also believe that Zenodo also uses DataCite, but the resources provided for the users are not the EZID but a reduced interface.
I agree that Zenodo/GitHub convenience is a strong point to consider for the version DOI (if that is adopted), but for the over-arching DOI, the priority should be on completeness of the record and freedom. This is more than the landing page, look at the schema pointed out by @ethanrd. I agree with the importance of defining the license, ASAP, but that doesn't need to block the DOI recording, which can be edited later to add the defined license. The license is not one of the required fields. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/127*issuecomment-1017199318__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!jhoI5U7VQaq4gTDp4Co3wtTdkCFsiZDX6bCnE-Ps6lUL571EhSVXztv6E7Vi6aE-L22rjWlJH18$ You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: <cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/127/[email protected]> This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
