And what is wrong with high end load balancing ;) I've written apps
that work fine across multiple servers with sticky sessions, with
zero problems. Most were done with using a Local Director with
sticky sessions.
---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 00:23:19 +1000
>And I would guess that this is all situated on one server, now what
>will
>happen when this load gets too much and you need to add an extra
>server.
>Using session variables means you need to then be tied to high end
>load
>balancing, or stick session scenarios.
>
>Using the client scope instead makes it easier for not only the
>scaling
>of the servers, but means you don't need to revisit the code and
>rewrite
>this code.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Herman Cremer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2001 11:51 PM
>> To: CF-Server
>> Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
>>
>> I have developed a whole stack of stuff
>> using session variables.
>>
>> Like an online accounting system with
>> 100+ users at a time, bashing away 12 hours a day.
>>
>> Never had a single problem.
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned....session vars works
>> very good.
>>
>>
>> Herman
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
