Andrew does have a point there, I am not a fan of stick IP based session
state management, I believe that that is a fundamentally flawed technology:

1) It kind of defeats the purpose of implementing fail-over, if a session is
tied to a box and that box goes down - well, goodbye session.

2) But the bigger issue is that of proxy servers, folks using NAT, ISP's who
share IP addresses among lots of users, etc. You end up with hardware that
sees all those sessions as the same IP address and they all end up on one
box. So, one box overworked (and subject to problem 1) and the other sitting
idle.

--- Ben



-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:36 AM
To: CF-Server
Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...


And what is wrong with high end load balancing ;)  I've written apps
that work fine across multiple servers with sticky sessions, with
zero problems.  Most were done with using a Local Director with
sticky sessions.

---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 00:23:19 +1000

>And I would guess that this is all situated on one server, now what
>will
>happen when this load gets too much and you need to add an extra
>server.
>Using session variables means you need to then be tied to high end
>load
>balancing, or stick session scenarios.
>
>Using the client scope instead makes it easier for not only the
>scaling
>of the servers, but means you don't need to revisit the code and
>rewrite
>this code.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Herman Cremer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2001 11:51 PM
>> To: CF-Server
>> Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
>>
>> I have developed a whole stack of stuff
>> using session variables.
>>
>> Like an online accounting system with
>> 100+ users at a time, bashing away 12 hours a day.
>>
>> Never had a single problem.
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned....session vars works
>> very good.
>>
>>
>> Herman
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com

Reply via email to