I am only going by my experience, as I said some companies I have worked
for will not allow session variables so you are forced to find
alternatives. It's not hard to use client instead of session.

There is a very good white paper that was listed in one of the lists
awhile ago, which I found very good for those who don't know anything
about load balancing etc...

Look use what you want if it works for you, but when you come across a
large organization as I have now many times, have protocols in place
that state NO session variables are allowed to be used. So I guess it
becomes second nature to say not to use session vars, but like I said if
it works for you then go for it...

I used them in my earlier days as well, but haven't used session
variable now for 2 years as there is always another way!!!



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2001 12:36 AM
> To: CF-Server
> Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
>
> And what is wrong with high end load balancing ;)  I've written apps
> that work fine across multiple servers with sticky sessions, with
> zero problems.  Most were done with using a Local Director with
> sticky sessions.
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 00:23:19 +1000
>
> >And I would guess that this is all situated on one server, now what
> >will
> >happen when this load gets too much and you need to add an extra
> >server.
> >Using session variables means you need to then be tied to high end
> >load
> >balancing, or stick session scenarios.
> >
> >Using the client scope instead makes it easier for not only the
> >scaling
> >of the servers, but means you don't need to revisit the code and
> >rewrite
> >this code.
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Herman Cremer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2001 11:51 PM
> >> To: CF-Server
> >> Subject: RE: Using CFAPP and inactive interfaces...
> >>
> >> I have developed a whole stack of stuff
> >> using session variables.
> >>
> >> Like an online accounting system with
> >> 100+ users at a time, bashing away 12 hours a day.
> >>
> >> Never had a single problem.
> >>
> >> As far as I'm concerned....session vars works
> >> very good.
> >>
> >>
> >> Herman
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com

Reply via email to