Dave Watts wrote: > Oh, I think you're damming with faint praise. I don't think there's anything > wrong with Solaris, or Linux for that matter (although as Linux becomes more > user-friendly, I suspect the typical default install will become more > vulnerable).
The only thing that is wrong with it (for us) is that it doesn't support ASP (which some people would claim to be a Good Thing(tm)). And the particular flavour we like (OpenBSD, the "secure by default didn't get hacked in 4 years"-flavour) isn't supported by ColdFusion. But that is a shortcoming of ColdFusion, since it fails to support even the other big BSD's (FreeBSD and Mac OS X). > I use Windows more, myself, and I'm more familiar and > comfortable with it, but I think that Unix is certainly easier to manage, if > you know what you're doing. Anything that stores config info in text files that are readable to the human eye is ultimately easier to manage as Windows. Jochem ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body or visit the list page at www.houseoffusion.com
