I solved the Flash MX problem by hiring one of the guys who wrote the Flash MX certification test and is writing the accompanying book. I also know at least two other Flash MX developers in the Bay Area that are up to speed on Flash remoting now.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:36 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? > > My only issue with the "Rich Client" thing is... well... there's only one > branden hall in the world and Mr. Watts, I'm sure you're doing a good job > keeping him busy. Seriously, to truly be a good developer into Flash > Remoting, I think we'd have to have that much knowledge, because as it > stands... getting Data into Flash is easy, but I have a feeling a lot of > CF > developers (like myself) are going to scratch their heads and go, "Now > what?" > > Ideally, this would be great if your business was split equally between CF > / Flash MX people and you had a great team of both that could learn from > each other. My problem is, that... at the company I work for, only the > "partners" get to play with Flash and even then, they're hacks and... > don't > even know that Flash MX is out yet (nor the power they can do with it). > > Sigh... did I mention I'm looking for a new job? ;) > > ~Todd > > At 07:30 PM 8/1/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > > Is it me, or has anyone else noticed there's a REALLY strong > > > push for Flash lately at all the CFUGs and conferences?? Is > > > there any particular reason for this? > > > >Sure. MM sells CF, MM sells Flash, MM would like more money! > > > >On a more serious note, though, I think that MM's strategy is to push > >developers into what you might call "rich client" applications. There are > a > >lot of limitations in what you can do with an HTML GUI. Flash goes far > >beyond those limitations, allowing you to build applications that provide > >significantly more functionality. The reason that web applications are > >popular isn't because of the great HTML interface - it's probably close > to > >as bad an interface as possible. So, the logical next step is to provide > >web-based applications with better interfaces. This was the original > promise > >of Java, if you remember back a few years. Flash is a tool which can > fulfill > >that promise. > > > > > I like Flash - don't get me wrong. But I view it as a GUI > > > frill that I doubt I can sell to my clients who want a > > > functional business application. Anyone here can tell me > > > why/how I could sell them Flash which would be over and > > > above CF development? > > > >It's a common programmers' mistake to think about interfaces as a > "frill". > >For an end-user, the interface is ALL THERE IS. Good interface design is > >necessary for a good application. HTML interfaces may be passable, but I > >wouldn't consider them "good" - you'd really hate to use every function > on > >your computer through such an interface, wouldn't you? > > > >So, to counteract this misunderstanding, you might show functional > business > >applications written in Flash to your clients. In such an application, > >you'll see things that would be impractical or impossible in HTML - using > >Flash to add functionality, instead of "skip intro" glitter. These > >applications are out there. > > > >Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > >http://www.figleaf.com/ > >voice: (202) 797-5496 > >fax: (202) 797-5444 > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
