Matt,

Once again, you are making an issue on CF-Talk a personal one.  Keep
this professional, and lay off the drive to come out on top with this
one.  It really degrades the integrity of this list.

Bottom line, if **ANYONE** in your shop or mine is not mindful of
bandwidth considerations REGARDLESS OF THEIR ROLE, it hurts the overall
outcome of the web application.  Anyone who works in this field knows
that.  

No one is making gross generalizations of Flash, nor HTML, nor DHTML.
Understand the context in which people respond to your posts.  You come
across strong, you will get strong responses.

That said, I am finished with this thread.  No need to let this one go
on any further.  I'm tired of the mudslinging.

--Paul

Paul W. Wille           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
---------------------------------------------------
ISITE Design, Inc. -- Senior Programmer
www.isitedesign.com
615 SW Broadway, Suite 200
Portland, OR 97205
503.221.9860 x110
503.221.9865
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?

I didn't make any blanket statement in regard to Flash and bandwidth. I
have stated over and over again that it depends on the application. My
statement was in reference to the blanket statement made earlier that
Flash saved bandwidth.

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V: 415-577-8070
F: 415-341-8906
P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wille, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:39 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?
> 
> Negative.  A GOOD Flash developer is very mindful of bandwidth.
Perhaps
> you should check with the award winning Flash developer you hired.
> 
> I am not trying to say to anyone that Flash is the end-all, be-all of
web
> development.  Same with ColdFusion MX.  What I AM saying, though, is
that
> the proof is oh-so-simple: when only transmitting data rather than UI
> components + data, its obvious to see which will require less
bandwidth.
> Our Flash developers are very mindful of size/download time of their
flash
> components, regardless of size or complexity.  I think that both you
and I
> can agree that Flash, when appropriated correctly, CAN save bandwidth.
> The converse holds true as well.  I just don't appreciate the blanket
> implication that Flash ALWAYS is more bandwidth intensive.
> 
> Let's all remember that this is an open forum, we all have the place
to
> hold our respective opinions, and respect others as well.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --Paul
> 
> 
> Paul W. Wille           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
> ---------------------------------------------------
> ISITE Design, Inc. -- Senior Programmer
> www.isitedesign.com
> 615 SW Broadway, Suite 200
> Portland, OR 97205
> 503.221.9860 x110
> 503.221.9865
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Thu 8/1/2002 4:36 PM
>       To: CF-Talk
>       Cc:
>       Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash
agenda?
> 
> 
> 
>       That is absolutely not true. A good Flash developer will create
a UI
>       that meets the business requirements of the application and
allows a
>       user to easily make use of it. That may or may not use more
> bandwidth
>       than an html based application with the same business
requirements.
> 
>       Matt Liotta
>       President & CEO
>       Montara Software, Inc.
>       http://www.montarasoftware.com/
>       V: 415-577-8070
>       F: 415-341-8906
>       P: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>       > -----Original Message-----
>       > From: Wille, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 5:33 PM
>       > To: CF-Talk
>       > Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash
> agenda?
>       >
>       > And you are making assumptions as well here.  A *GOOD* Flash
> developer
>       > would design the Flash interface to be lightweight, preload
once
> (or
>       as
>       > minimal as possible), and minimize the size of his/her Flash
> movies.
>       No
>       > different is the argument that CFML is slow.  Those of us that
> know
>       CFML
>       > know that any poor developer can write bad CFML that will
> inherently
>       be
>       > slow.
>       >
>       > I fail to understand your point of view on this.  I think you
can
> see
>       > where I am coming from.
>       >
>       > Paul W. Wille           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       > ---------------------------------------------------
>       > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
>       > ---------------------------------------------------
>       > ISITE Design, Inc. -- Senior Programmer
>       > www.isitedesign.com
>       > 615 SW Broadway, Suite 200
>       > Portland, OR 97205
>       > 503.221.9860 x110
>       > 503.221.9865
>       >
>       >
>       > -----Original Message-----
>       > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 5:26 PM
>       > To: CF-Talk
>       > Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash
> agenda?
>       >
>       > > If your whole site is in Flash it loads once.  The Flash
movie
> is
>       > equal
>       > > to one or two rich HTML pages in size.  Perform more than
two
>       > functions
>       > > on your site and you're then passing less data than you
would
> via
>       > HTML.
>       > > That's the simplified version of how it works.  I doubt
Talkers
>       really
>       > > cares more about it than that, unless they're actually
building
> an
>       > app.
>       > > Then it's worth it to go into the specifics.
>       > >
>       > You are making assumptions. Flash gives you the ability to do
> things
>       you
>       > couldn't do before in html, which could required higher
bandwidth
> than
>       > the equivalent application using html. While the extra
bandwidth
> may
>       be
>       > worth it for a better experience, the extra bandwidth is still
> there.
>       > Flash applications do not inherently save bandwidth.
>       >
>       > -Matt
>       >
>       >
>       >
> 
> 

______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to