> Are you guys beating a dead horse just because Matt was riding it? I just got a mental image of someone riding a dead horse. ha! Anyways, no, I don't believe that's the reason. However, I do think that your comment brings up a good point. Usually when I post messages to threads that Matt has joined/started, it's usually for clarity, not necessarily an attack or even an argument.
I would request, Matt, that you elaborate on your responses more before sending them off. I don't mean this as an attack on you, but most of these threads that have gotten out of hand lately could have been prevented simply by clarity. It's not enough to tell someone they're wrong... you have to explain why. <g> Ben Johnson ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
