Maybe it's time for a CF equivalent of Option Explicit? -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 9:28:35 AM, you wrote: MAKC> Brian, MAKC> No - I think this is one of the limitations of using a loosely "typed" (or MAKC> no typed <ha>) language. Obviously, if you were forced to declare each MAKC> variable by type in advance this problem would not exist. MAKC> -mk ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
