See - now you are thinking <g>. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:33 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RESOLVED: Re: 33 and 33d the same?
Maybe it's time for a CF equivalent of Option Explicit? -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 9:28:35 AM, you wrote: MAKC> Brian, MAKC> No - I think this is one of the limitations of using a loosely "typed" (or MAKC> no typed <ha>) language. Obviously, if you were forced to declare each MAKC> variable by type in advance this problem would not exist. MAKC> -mk ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
