At 04:00 PM 9/2/2002 -0700, you wrote: >I can't really speak to Budd's books but OO has moved on a lot since '91.. >.
I doubt that the motivating concepts behind OO has changed. Languages change, and implementation details are different in each language, but the concepts don't really change that much. ( At least in my experience and my schooling supported that ). Since most of the "OO" languages are really hybrid languages that draw from both Object Oriented paradigm and procedural programming paradigm, I would be willing to be that any "movement" has to due with creating approaches that can take the best of both worlds. -- Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need a Web Developer? Contact me! AIM: Reboog711 | Phone: 1-203-379-0773 -- My CFMX Book: <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072225564/instantcoldfu-20> My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
