Yep, and that's what I would recommend as well. -RC
> > If you use private as your scope, you could dump it with > <cfdump var=#private#>. > > >People know they can do this - the problem I think is simply the > >documentation. I think people wanted this concept (of the > private scope > >and This) to be a bit more fleshed out. Also, in 'normal' > CFML pages, > >you can dump all local variables by dumping the Variables > scope. Even > >though private variables act like Variables variables (ick, > sorry ;), > >you can't cfdump it. So, it's not a question of people not knowing > >away around the issue, but just wanting things to be a bit more > >elegant. (Of course, that's my take on it and I don't speak for ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
