Thanks Sean.. haha.. i never said CFMX was slow.. just making comments, so maybe we can have best of all worlds in CFMX .. u know :) > > Ah, Joe's finally found something that actually runs *faster* in CFMX! :)
Do you know of way to get around this? Maybe force compile like in CFMX or maybe compile it to Native Code Vs ByteCode..(Whats the best compiler for this?) I am not sure how this works.. Would it make a difference if i store the Object in Application Scope? > faster in CFMX simply because it's "Java-native" as opposed to having to > go through a bridge in earlier CF releases for every operation on a Java > object. What do you suggest? Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:23 AM Subject: Re: JVM setting? > On Wednesday, January 2, 2002, at 07:26 , Joe Eugene wrote: > > Is there any reason why CFOBJECT Java Class file call would Very SLOW > > in CF4.5 and CF5.0 compared to CFMX... > > Ah, Joe's finally found something that actually runs *faster* in CFMX! :) > > (Sorry Joe, couldn't resist!) > > I would expect Java object creation (and subsequent manipulation) to be > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
