A Yankee Group report from Oct 2001 (AFAIK it's the latest on the topic) lists CF as 
the #2 platform used in IT infrastructure/intranet applications.

As for increasing the attractiveness of ColdFusion for high-volume large enterprise 
sites, we think we've taken a big leap forward on that by recently releasing CFMX for 
J2EE so that both existing and new CF apps can be scaled as a business's needs grow. 
IBM is marketing this to its customers, in addition to the other flavors of it which 
are available.

Vernon Viehe 
ColdFusion Community Manager 
Developer Relations 
Macromedia, Inc. 
Online diary: http://vvmx.blogspot.com/ 
-------------------- 
Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida 
Architecting a New Internet Experience 
Register today at www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for
ColdFusion?


Huh?! That makes no sense whatsoever. How does being "eminently suitable
for high-volume sites" in any way negate the reality that it's widely
used for internal applications? And, of course, internal apps are
frequently far, far more data intensive than public sites and are
heavily trafficked to boot.

Ken



-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Bullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: The Hidden CF factor was RE: How Good is the Job Market for
ColdFusion?


This whole 'Hidden CF Factor' sort of reminds me of 'Wagner's music is
better than it sounds' or perhaps 'Pay no attention to the man behind
the curtain.'

What hogwash! Basic statistics tell us that there is probably as much
'hidden' (read: 'intranet') ASP, PHP, and J2EE, proportionately, as
their is CF.

On the other hand if MM *insists* that CF is 'more pervasive than the
visible penetration would indicate' then that puts the lie to what
Allaire and MM have said all along...that CF is eminently suitable for
high-volume sites in which usage patterns are unpredictable.

In all, they can't have it both ways, now can they? :-)

Greg



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Reply via email to