While I agree with you that Macromedia should support Apache 2.0 for CF 5, I disagree with your post. You seem to imply that a normal IT shop wouldn't want to upgrade to CFMX until after it matures for a couple of years, yet you want to upgrade to Apache 2.0, which is certainly immature in comparison to Apache 1.3.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Bullough [mailto:gwb@;outofchaos.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: MM Has No Plans to Support Apache 2.0 > > The MM Partners office informs me that > MM has no plans to supply a mod_coldfusion.so > for CF 5.0/Linux/Apache 2.0 > > 'Not enough demand' they say. > > So know we know MM's policy on one-release- > back support. They don't do what's right: they > do what will not get them punished by losing > too many customers. > > If you haven't picked the platform that's going to be most > popular, you're out of luck, and even if you have, maybe > you're out of luck anyway, and if you're not prepared to > keep churning through releases (rather than maintaining > existing release levels for several years, as is normal I/T > practice) you're out of luck. > > As such, MM has decided that Cold Fusion is the > wrong choice for mission-critical business applications, > because it will not have the kind of support that the > I/T industry expects. > > Greg > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
