But, apparently security is being address otherwise 1.3.26 would have been the last latest build. 1.3.27 is now the next new build. I would think that Apache 2 runs the risk of finding new security holes at the moment than Apache 1.3.x - that's just my opinion tho.
~Todd On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Greg Bullough wrote: > At 07:43 AM 11/11/02 -0800, Sean A Corfield wrote: > > Since you seem determined to stick with CF5, I can't > >see why you'd want to introduce the risk of upgrading to Apache 2.0.x? > >Your criticism is illogical. > > Security. It doesn't seem that clear that emerging Apache security > issues are going to be fixed in the 1.3 base as well as the 2.n base. > > Greg -- ============================================================ Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ | Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion | http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/ | http://www.devmx.com/ - Todd (Moderator / CoFounder) | http://www.flashCFM.com/ - webRat (Moderator) | Speakeasy DSL - http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/18280 | ============================================================ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
