Adam,

I'm looking at using it for about 15 sites we are involved with. Remember
that the VAST VAST majority of web sites out there never get any traffic and
have nothing more complicated than a style sheet <g>. These are folks that
pester the hosting company or original development company for copy changes.
For these sites, a product like this is perfect. There's no real money in
copy changes - in spite of the fees we charge.  Maintenance issues steal
time and momentum away from ongoing projects that do make money. I don't
think this is aimed at large portal, high traffic sites in need of a complex
CMS (although MM will be happy to sell to them <g>).  But there IS a market
for it.  And like someone has already pointed out - not every site needs a
database driven CF solution (although this IS a "CF" talk list :-)

-mk

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:adrocknatalk@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)


Well I'm curious about the bottom line.

Is anyone planning on implementing Contribute in a business setting?

Outside of giving it to your friend you made a site for, I can't see
implementing this is a real world application. After all, at 100 bucks a
pop, it doesn't become very cost effective beyond 5 people. At that
point you should seriously consider a real CMS. With real security and
centralized rights management.

Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division


-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)

I think there are going to be the pro camps and the con camps, I for one
have decided to sit firmly on the fence until Version 2/3.

Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:kgraeme@;facstaff.wisc.edu]
Sent: 12 November 2002 14:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,
is it Content Management or not?)


Millions. And considering Dreamweaver is the best selling web site
development app, it makes sense to have a lightweight, dumbed down
content
editor for those Dreamweaver sites.

-Kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
> [mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia
Contribute,
> is it Content Management or not?)
>
>
> and how many of those are around...?  I mean true old fashioned
> pre db boom
> websites...?  (and of which you cannot get a free editor to
> correct stuff..)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Beynon [mailto:John.Beynon@;era.co.uk]
> Sent: 12 November 2002 09:50
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia
Contribute,
> is it Content Management or not?)
>
>
> What do you expect for $99? It's not meant for editing web
applications,
> simply for editing websites!
>
> jb
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
> [mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
> Sent: 12 November 2002 09:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia
Contribute, is
> it Content Management or not?)
>
> yep, it hasnt not been thought through.,..if you have any kind of
> page which
> is not, lets say, normal......it will freak la sheek.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Notik [mailto:dave@;digital202.com]
> Sent: 11 November 2002 19:39
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is
> it Content Management or not?)
>
>
> Hmmm, it doesn't look like it works too well with Fusebox.  It loaded
> the first page, index.cfm, and then loaded all linked pages and
graphics
> (which is *everything*, since it all goes through index.cfm
> Fusebox-style).  Then it wouldn't let me edit "that region of the
> document" when clicking any text (maybe because it's in CFCASE or
> CFINCLUDE?).
>
> Just FYI...
>
> --D
>
> ###################
> David Notik
> Digital202, LLC
> Imagination gone digital.
> Web: www.digital202.com
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Office: (206) 575-1717
> Mobile: (206) 351-3948
> ###################
>
>
>
>
>



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Reply via email to