This is one of the points I thinking about earlier which escaped me as I
typed - this is a perfect explanation - ESPecially regarding the
momentum.

Also - someone else mentioned not cost effective past 5 people - I work
with organizations that make quite a few million dollars per year (
small but should be able to affor a few $k ) Which refuse to invest in a
built application OR any serious content management.

As for free apps out there - I have yet to find one that truly fits the
light needs of the example companies being mentioned.

I think Mark hit it on the head with - 
"There's no real money in copy changes - in spite of the fees we charge.
Maintenance issues steal time and momentum away from ongoing projects
that do make money. "

I personally have 1 full file box full of lengthy emails explaining a 1
sentence change on a non commerce page - of which I have had to resort
to printing, dating and putting time spent on it and having it accompany
a bill for those clients who bawk at a measly $200 bill one month...
while I have had to read through 50 emails  - print 30 of them, and note
everything - All of which consumes more consumables(printer ink) and
time in administration then the actual change takes - Funny thing is
clients - feel that part of that time is just part of doing business and
they are not responsible for that. 

I have a feeling that I am not the only one with 6 out of 10 clients who
fit this.

jay m.
Mark A. Kruger - CFG wrote:


Adam,



I'm looking at using it for about 15 sites we are involved with.
Remember

that the VAST VAST majority of web sites out there never get any traffic
and

have nothing more complicated than a style sheet <g>. These are folks
that

pester the hosting company or original development company for copy
changes.

For these sites, a product like this is perfect. There's no real money
in

copy changes - in spite of the fees we charge.  Maintenance issues steal

time and momentum away from ongoing projects that do make money. I don't

think this is aimed at large portal, high traffic sites in need of a
complex

CMS (although MM will be happy to sell to them <g>).  But there IS a
market

for it.  And like someone has already pointed out - not every site needs
a

database driven CF solution (although this IS a "CF" talk list :-)



-mk



-----Original Message-----

From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [ mailto:adrocknatalk@;hotmail.com
<mailto:adrocknatalk@;hotmail.com> ]

Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:39 AM

To: CF-Talk

Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,

is it Content Management or not?)





Well I'm curious about the bottom line.



Is anyone planning on implementing Contribute in a business setting?



Outside of giving it to your friend you made a site for, I can't see

implementing this is a real world application. After all, at 100 bucks a

pop, it doesn't become very cost effective beyond 5 people. At that

point you should seriously consider a real CMS. With real security and

centralized rights management.



Adam Wayne Lehman

Web Systems Developer

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Distance Education Division





-----Original Message-----

From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)

[ mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com
<mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com> ]

Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:18 AM

To: CF-Talk

Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,

is it Content Management or not?)



I think there are going to be the pro camps and the con camps, I for one

have decided to sit firmly on the fence until Version 2/3.



Neil



-----Original Message-----

From: Kevin Graeme [ mailto:kgraeme@;facstaff.wisc.edu
<mailto:kgraeme@;facstaff.wisc.edu> ]

Sent: 12 November 2002 14:09

To: CF-Talk

Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute,

is it Content Management or not?)





Millions. And considering Dreamweaver is the best selling web site

development app, it makes sense to have a lightweight, dumbed down

content

editor for those Dreamweaver sites.



-Kevin



  

-----Original Message-----

From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)

[ mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com
<mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com> ]

Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:56 AM

To: CF-Talk

Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia

    

Contribute,

  

is it Content Management or not?)





and how many of those are around...?  I mean true old fashioned

pre db boom

websites...?  (and of which you cannot get a free editor to

correct stuff..)



-----Original Message-----

From: John Beynon [ mailto:John.Beynon@;era.co.uk
<mailto:John.Beynon@;era.co.uk> ]

Sent: 12 November 2002 09:50

To: CF-Talk

Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia

    

Contribute,

  

is it Content Management or not?)





What do you expect for $99? It's not meant for editing web

    

applications,

  

simply for editing websites!



jb



-----Original Message-----

From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)

[ mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com
<mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com> ]

Sent: 12 November 2002 09:44

To: CF-Talk

Subject: RE: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia

    

Contribute, is

  

it Content Management or not?)



yep, it hasnt not been thought through.,..if you have any kind of

page which

is not, lets say, normal......it will freak la sheek.



-----Original Message-----

From: David Notik [ mailto:dave@;digital202.com
<mailto:dave@;digital202.com> ]

Sent: 11 November 2002 19:39

To: CF-Talk

Subject: Contribute and Fusebox (WAS RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is

it Content Management or not?)





Hmmm, it doesn't look like it works too well with Fusebox.  It loaded

the first page, index.cfm, and then loaded all linked pages and

    

graphics

  

(which is *everything*, since it all goes through index.cfm

Fusebox-style).  Then it wouldn't let me edit "that region of the

document" when clicking any text (maybe because it's in CFCASE or

CFINCLUDE?).



Just FYI...



--D



###################

David Notik

Digital202, LLC

Imagination gone digital.

Web:  www.digital202.com <http://www.digital202.com> 

E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:dave@;digital202.com> 

Office: (206) 575-1717

Mobile: (206) 351-3948

###################











    








~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to