There seems to be something to this issue.. Which we have noted in the
thread I mentioned in an earlier post from MM's forum. When SQL (2K or
7) is on the same box, this tends not to happen. However, I recall that
we had at least one instance of it occuring regardless of the fact that
SQL was on the same box. (Brook, can you confirm/deny this for me? I
thought you were involved in that convo.) At any rate, it DOES appear
to be DB/DB Driver related. How, specifically, I don't know. And so
far, neither does anyone else, from what I have heard/seen/read.
If you missed my post of the thread location, here it is:
http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/messageview.cfm?catid=143&thr
eadid=468954
HTH
Lee
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Fitch, Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:10 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
|
|
| We sure are. MSSQL 2k though. That's the only difference I've seen.
|
| t
|
| **********************************************************************
| Tyler M. Fitch
| Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer http://isitedesign.com
| **********************************************************************
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:06 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
|
|
| I'm going to guess that your not running SQL Server on a
| separate box. Are you?
|
| At 04:00 PM 27/11/02 -0700, you wrote:
| >Brook,
| >
| >Since people only seem to mention CFMX when it does bad, I'm going to
| >mention when it does good.
| >
| >I've personally had atleast half dozen CFMX installs go fine. The
| >sites on the boxes run fine. Even under load. So I for one
| say 'CFMX
| >is ready for production. (just build your site to take advantage of
| >it)'. I would and do recommend it for anyone looking to build a web
| >app.
| >
| >We launched a pretty good site that was half CFMX, half CF5
| less than a
|
| >month after CFMX's release date. No updater was available and we had
| >no problems. The network load-balancing solution our client had
| >selected went down before the CF servers did under load.
| >
| >We had 200 simulateous requests chugging along on our Win2k
| server with
|
| >IIS5. If your server is crashing at 6 I'd check your code first and
| >stop complaining about the server. Something bigger seems
| to be going
| >on.
| >
| >If you upgraded from 5, then did you test your app before hand? Any
| >load testing would have brought this problem up.
| >
| >Good luck,
| >
| >t
| >
| >*************************************************************
| *********
| >Tyler M. Fitch
| >Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer http://isitedesign.com
| >*************************************************************
| *********
| >
| >-----Original Message-----
| >From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| >Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:45 PM
| >To: CF-Talk
| >Subject: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
| >
| >
| >Well, our CFMX server just crashed for the 4th time today.
| I've had the
|
| >perfmon open all day and have been watching the traffic. We had an
| >average of 12 connections when the running requests started
| to grow and
|
| >grow. As I
| >mentioned in my previous post, there were 3 running requests
| that had
| >not finished for hours. As far as the number of CFMX
| request, as I was
| >watching
| >it, it never went above 6. This really means there was a max of 3
| >running
| >requests (on top of the 3 that were already dead), it would
| go up to 6
| >and
| >then back down to 3. Those 3 threads weren't going anywhere.
| >
| >Then I noticed that the running requests was growing
| incrementally, so
| >I
| >
| >tried to make an HTTP request to the server....and it did
| not respond.
| >I
| >
| >checked the running requests, and there was one more. The server was
| >DEAD, HUNG, FINISHED - KAPUT.
| >
| >The Perfmon counter restarted jrun when the running requests reached
| >10,
| >
| >and the server came back to life. Thank you Lee Fuller for this
| >temporary fix.
| >
| >What is Macromedia doing about this? CFMX is not ready for
| production.
| >If your sales of CFMX are not what you expected, there's a fairly
| >obvious reason why. I certainly, based on my experience, would not
| >recommend (and I
| >think anyone running CFMX would agree) anyone to switch to
| CFMX anytime
| >soon. Unless you have plenty of spare time to baby sit your server.
| >
| >Brook
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
