We won't tell it if you don't..
At 05:52 PM 27/11/02 -0600, you wrote:
>Don't tell my machine then, I run CFMX on RedHat Linux, and use an ODBC
>connection to SQL2000 on a Windows box - no problems so far.
>
>=====================================
>Douglas White
>group Manager
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.samcfug.org
>=====================================
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Lee Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 5:17 PM
>Subject: RE: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
>
>
>| There seems to be something to this issue.. Which we have noted in the
>| thread I mentioned in an earlier post from MM's forum. When SQL (2K or
>| 7) is on the same box, this tends not to happen. However, I recall that
>| we had at least one instance of it occuring regardless of the fact that
>| SQL was on the same box. (Brook, can you confirm/deny this for me? I
>| thought you were involved in that convo.) At any rate, it DOES appear
>| to be DB/DB Driver related. How, specifically, I don't know. And so
>| far, neither does anyone else, from what I have heard/seen/read.
>|
>| If you missed my post of the thread location, here it is:
>|
>|
>| http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/messageview.cfm?catid=143&thr
>| eadid=468954
>|
>| HTH
>|
>| Lee
>|
>|
>| | -----Original Message-----
>| | From: Fitch, Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>| | Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:10 PM
>| | To: CF-Talk
>| | Subject: RE: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
>| |
>| |
>| | We sure are. MSSQL 2k though. That's the only difference I've seen.
>| |
>| | t
>| |
>| | **********************************************************************
>| | Tyler M. Fitch
>| | Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer http://isitedesign.com
>| | **********************************************************************
>| |
>| | -----Original Message-----
>| | From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>| | Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:06 PM
>| | To: CF-Talk
>| | Subject: RE: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
>| |
>| |
>| | I'm going to guess that your not running SQL Server on a
>| | separate box. Are you?
>| |
>| | At 04:00 PM 27/11/02 -0700, you wrote:
>| | >Brook,
>| | >
>| | >Since people only seem to mention CFMX when it does bad, I'm going to
>| | >mention when it does good.
>| | >
>| | >I've personally had atleast half dozen CFMX installs go fine. The
>| | >sites on the boxes run fine. Even under load. So I for one
>| | say 'CFMX
>| | >is ready for production. (just build your site to take advantage of
>| | >it)'. I would and do recommend it for anyone looking to build a web
>| | >app.
>| | >
>| | >We launched a pretty good site that was half CFMX, half CF5
>| | less than a
>| |
>| | >month after CFMX's release date. No updater was available and we had
>| | >no problems. The network load-balancing solution our client had
>| | >selected went down before the CF servers did under load.
>| | >
>| | >We had 200 simulateous requests chugging along on our Win2k
>| | server with
>| |
>| | >IIS5. If your server is crashing at 6 I'd check your code first and
>| | >stop complaining about the server. Something bigger seems
>| | to be going
>| | >on.
>| | >
>| | >If you upgraded from 5, then did you test your app before hand? Any
>| | >load testing would have brought this problem up.
>| | >
>| | >Good luck,
>| | >
>| | >t
>| | >
>| | >*************************************************************
>| | *********
>| | >Tyler M. Fitch
>| | >Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer http://isitedesign.com
>| | >*************************************************************
>| | *********
>| | >
>| | >-----Original Message-----
>| | >From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>| | >Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:45 PM
>| | >To: CF-Talk
>| | >Subject: CFMX Server Crash #4 for the day..
>| | >
>| | >
>| | >Well, our CFMX server just crashed for the 4th time today.
>| | I've had the
>| |
>| | >perfmon open all day and have been watching the traffic. We had an
>| | >average of 12 connections when the running requests started
>| | to grow and
>| |
>| | >grow. As I
>| | >mentioned in my previous post, there were 3 running requests
>| | that had
>| | >not finished for hours. As far as the number of CFMX
>| | request, as I was
>| | >watching
>| | >it, it never went above 6. This really means there was a max of 3
>| | >running
>| | >requests (on top of the 3 that were already dead), it would
>| | go up to 6
>| | >and
>| | >then back down to 3. Those 3 threads weren't going anywhere.
>| | >
>| | >Then I noticed that the running requests was growing
>| | incrementally, so
>| | >I
>| | >
>| | >tried to make an HTTP request to the server....and it did
>| | not respond.
>| | >I
>| | >
>| | >checked the running requests, and there was one more. The server was
>| | >DEAD, HUNG, FINISHED - KAPUT.
>| | >
>| | >The Perfmon counter restarted jrun when the running requests reached
>| | >10,
>| | >
>| | >and the server came back to life. Thank you Lee Fuller for this
>| | >temporary fix.
>| | >
>| | >What is Macromedia doing about this? CFMX is not ready for
>| | production.
>| | >If your sales of CFMX are not what you expected, there's a fairly
>| | >obvious reason why. I certainly, based on my experience, would not
>| | >recommend (and I
>| | >think anyone running CFMX would agree) anyone to switch to
>| | CFMX anytime
>| | >soon. Unless you have plenty of spare time to baby sit your server.
>| | >
>| | >Brook
>| | >
>| | >
>| | >
>| | >
>| | >
>| |
>| |
>|
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
