Well, again. It's nothing. You can run a test yourself to see. Just turn on
debugging in the CF Administrator.
---mark
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Warrick
Phone: (714) 547-5386
Efax.com Fax: (801) 730-7289
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal URL: http://www.warrick.net
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Business URL: http://www.fusioneers.com
ICQ: 346566
--------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 4:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Application.cfm location costs?
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info, but the overhead I am curious about is that caused
> by the file system searching that must be done in order to traverse the
> directory tree and locate the application.cfm file.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/05/00 03:43PM >>>
> The existence of the file, itself, is nothing. It's like a millionth
> of a second or so. But what's IN the file, now that's where the lag
> could occur. The possibilities are endless here.
>
> I would recommend for a large site that you look into the Fusebox
> methodology. You can separate out local variables (within the sub apps)
> from global variables (which you store in a app_globals file) so that
> you only create overhead for the applicable section and not the entire
> application.
>
> ---mark
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Warrick
> Phone: (714) 547-5386
> Efax.com Fax: (801) 730-7289
> Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Personal URL: http://www.warrick.net
> Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Business URL: http://www.fusioneers.com
> ICQ: 346566
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 3:02 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Application.cfm location costs?
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have any benchmarks on the overhead incurred by
> > putting the application.cfm file at the root of the web server,
> > 1-2 levels above the application files?
> >
> > We are trying to develop a site-wide framework, and we are
> > debating whether it is better to have one application.cfm at the
> > root of the server or one in each application directory that
> > cfincludes the one at the root.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kevin Miller
> > Vascular Chief Technologist
> > Medtronic Vascular
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (707) 566-1200
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------
> > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> > To Unsubscribe visit
> > http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=sts&body=sts/cf_tal
> > k or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the body.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
> or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> 'unsubscribe' in the body.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf
_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the
body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebarRsts&bodyRsts/cf_talk or send a message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
