I love CFSCRIPT. less typing, and supposedly faster execution that tag-based CF. It is a pain that there aren't 'real' operators in it, but such is life. If I'm not actively outputing text, or doing something that requires a tag (like queries), I'm usually in CFSCRIPT blocks.
> -----Original Message----- > From: webguy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:07 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: OOP, Custom Tags.. > > > > If you're using CFMX, though, you might not even bother with it. Its > > popularity is largely based on the fact that it's the only way to write > > user-defined functions in CF 5. You can do a lot more (and do it better) > > with the CFFUNCTION tag in CFMX. > > Really Dave ? I would say programmers coming from php,c,java,javascript > would find <cfscript preferable in some a lot of cases. > I do. Especially for loops in loops etc... > > Pity stuff like ==, != and i++ aren't is cfscript . > > > > I'll look into the syntax more, but can you tell > > > me if I can include all my cfscripts in a separate > > > doc? I can just make it a cfinclude, why not > > You can even put a function into application, session etc. scope. > > WG --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
