> Dave said: > I might prefer the syntax of CFSCRIPT too, but that's easily outweighed by > the ability in CFFUNCTION to validate argument datatypes and requirements > with the TYPE and REQUIRED attributes of CFARGUMENT, and specify > the return > datatype of the function using the RETURNTYPE attribute of CFFUNCTION. To > me, both of those things - and especially the first - make up for > any syntax > preferences I might have for C-style code.
True, pity you can't do function myf (name string, o myobject) You would think it would very easy since <cffunction has it . WG ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
