Note that Fusebox as a collection of files constitutes a framework. The flip thingy is the methodology that the creators of Fusebox offer. I don't use the flip methodology, but I do use the Fusebox framework.
----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:40 pm Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX > Hi, > > Actually, I totally understand where you're coming from. I wasn't > tryingto imply that Fusebox is better, because for some people it > certainly is > not. And, you are right--A methodology is supposed to make development > smoother; or at least more standardized. If it doesn't then you > shouldn't use it. Given that Fusebox has been through so many changes > and because there are now several hybrids available that address > many of > the issues developers have faced in the past, I was simply suggesting > that you re-test the waters to determine if the workaround issues you > are concerned with still exist. > > In any case, you seem to be very comfortable and productive within > yourown methodology; that is all that truly counts. :) > > Best regards > MW > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:21 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX > > > Nope..ya missed my point....CFMX migration was just an example. > but now we're heading towards what's better ;-) > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
