Apart from licencing costs? performance concerns? Recode issues with a few thousand CF sites? legacy constraints? Prior to updater 2 incredible security concerns regarding shared servers and factory services?
Well I thought about it. But instead I thought I'd just sever my own limbs with a plastic spork coated in salt if I ever got that masochistic again. New builds will be CFMX, assuming we don't find any more gaping issues that require disabling half of the core functionality for our apps to lock down.. As far as regclean? That goes under if severing my own limbs isn't masochistic enough. Scripted reg changes that aren't written inhouse, don't run on our servers. Windows makes a fine platform, as long as you rip its guts out, kick its head in and stomp its brains untill it behaves. Letting microsoft 'clean', 'tweak' or otherwise alter your system configuration if you've already configured it is somewhat akin to stabbing yourself in the stomach repeatedly to reach that itchy spot on your back. The issues it solves don't begin to encompass the issues it causes. ----- Original Message ----- From: "samcfug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:08 AM Subject: Re: WebDAV exploit? > Many of them probably need to have the MS app "regclean.exe" run to cleanup the > registry problems that are interfering with the orderly shutdown, etc. It > should be run periodically on most any windows box. > > On the other hand, whay are you still using CF 5.0? you haven't migrated all of > them to CFMX Enterpeise yet? LOL > > ===================================== > Douglas White > group Manager > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.samcfug.org > ===================================== > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 6:32 PM > Subject: Re: WebDAV exploit? > > > | Rolled out the webdav fix across the full server farm, including umm 30 or > | 40 ish CF5 boxes on IIS 5. No issues to date. Had a few boxes that needed to > | be manually kicked a few times when they hung during shut down, and a few > | boxes that needed the services restarted when they came back up. > | > | But nothing in particular beyond the usualy MS rollout woes. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
