yes but ur never wrong, i put my faith in your knowledge! my only disagreement with you is this: "But how about an official Best Practice from Microsoft?"
I personally believe that m$ doesn't have any best practices I used to look up to and defend them but not anymore. to me the "one who flew over the cuckoos nest" is m$ but then again it could be me as well;) that being said I do like sql 2000 server (everyone has too do something right, haha) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ... > Dave Lyons wrote: > > hard to disagree with what you say jochem cause ur always right. > > Thank you for the compliment. But you know, in investment this would be > the time to start doing the opposite from what I am saying, because you > should never go with the herd :-) > > > > But it brings up two points (at least 4 me) > > 1) When it was brought up that it was the small video card I was kinda > > surprised and asked my host about it & I got an "have you smoking crack > > again" response. and these are people who do networking & data recovery for > > the gov & are ms certified and all that. He said that he hasn't even scene a > > 16 color card in a long time. Maybe we are just spoiled to not have > > bandwidth issues, I don't know. > > Install a plain VGA driver on a 16 gazillion color card and it will have > just 16 colors. > > > > 2) if you are running 16 color cards how are you getting it to install? > > Would seem to me that you would have troubles as well then, correct? > > Being that it falls under the minimum required? > > I am not running CF MX in production yet. For various reasons it did not > qualify for the setup I wanted (since you might get the impression that > I am a security zealot, let me just say that security was not one of > those reasons). RedSky appears to be the first version that does > qualify, so it was the first version that I built a staging environment > for. And that was why I ran into the problem 3 weeks ago. > > > > To me this falls under the "tweaking" category and I don't feel MM is > > responsible for making it work perfectly with each persons personal > > "tweaking" of their systems. > > But how about an official Best Practice from Microsoft? > > > > I got $20 that says that this issue has to do with how the host has his > > system set up & that somewhere in the docs it says that acknowledges it and > > advises against it & u (jochem) will be the one to point it out as always:) > > Based on what I have read, I believe that the suggestions to change the > installation order have a high probability of fixing it. I don't know > who would be to blame for that, and I don't find that particularly > interesting. > > > > aside from that, when u coming state side jochem? > > the offer is still open and the new house has a nice indoor pool/hot tub > > (not to mention the umm.... "scenery") > > Unfortunately, that will be a while. > > Jochem > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
