Nice! execution time is now 2800ms. I guess Stacy will be mad with me because o do not trust her in the first place. I'm sorry Stacy, my fault ;)
Maybe if i cache some more queries and, run LorCat i could get this page to run in about 1100ms, witch wont be good but will be fine for me. Thank you Barney. >Application.cfm: ><cfset request.starttime = gettickcount() /> > >OnRequestEnd.cfm: ><cfoutput>Execution Time: #int(gettickcount() - >request.starttime)#ms</cfoutput> > >That won't be exact, but within a handful of milliseconds. > >--- >Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer >AudienceCentral (formerly PIER System, Inc.) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >voice : 360.756.8080 x12 >fax : 360.647.5351 > >www.audiencecentral.com > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:01 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Improve FB3 website performance >> >> >> Stacy, how can i know the execution time with debuggin off? Yes, >> i've tried with debuggin of, i cant see much diference. >> >> I'm using an athlon xp 2.2 1gb ram ddr and hd 80gb 7200rpm. >> Apparently, debug on or off does not make any diference. >> >> Regards, >> >> BP. >> >> >Have u *tried* it with debug off? Because on CFMX with FB sites the >> >response time is unusually high. Sometimes upwards of 500-600ms for the >> >core file...but this disappears once debug is off. >> > >> >-Stace >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:35 PM >> >To: CF-Talk >> >Subject: Improve FB3 website performance >> > >> >a) Yes, they are. I guess the improvement will not make it go down >> >4500ms =( >> >b) Yes, your right on this, the cfmodule itself does not consume much >> >cpu load, there must be something in the logic our queries. >> > >> >Thank you Stacy. >> > >> > >> >>a) Are these page times being recorded while CFMX has debug on? If so, >> >>response should be improved once it's off. >> >>b) If all your module calls were as simple as setting a variable you >> >>wouldn't have this speed issue...meaning, I don't believe the module >> >>calls are the root cause of ur problem...while they do add overhead, >> >not >> >>sure it's 6 secs worth. You've got logic somewhere eating cpu cycles. >> >> >> >>-Stace >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >> >>From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:27 AM >> >>To: CF-Talk >> >>Subject: Improve FB3 website performance >> >> >> >>I will try do to some query caching but i doubt the actual 6000+ms >> >>execution time will drop to below 1000, witch is that i'm used. >> >> >> >>Thanks for your reply. >> >> >> > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
