32 recursive calls in FB3 means 32 executions of the core file. It's singularly horrible, but that's life if you don't want to break encapsulation. It's also one of the reasons that FB4 kicks so much ass. In reality, it's not all that bad, logic is fast, DB queries are slow, and the core file's execution time usually pales next to the DB interaction overhead. Not to say that running the same code over and over again is a good thing, but it's not as bad as it could be.
barneyb --- Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer AudienceCentral (formerly PIER System, Inc.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice : 360.756.8080 x12 fax : 360.647.5351 www.audiencecentral.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Luce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:29 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Improve FB3 website performance > > > Did anyone consider that the core file running 32 times may be a > problem? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:53 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Improve FB3 website performance > > > Ack! How about we use my middle name, Tyler? ;-) lol... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:10 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Improve FB3 website performance > > hmmm... > > I work with a female stacy. > > oddly enough, im a tony and my fiancee is a jayme > > all of this androgyny what are we going to do? > > tony weeg > uncertified advanced cold fusion developer > tony at navtrak dot net > www.navtrak.net > 410.548.2337 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:05 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Improve FB3 website performance > > > Good to hear !! not that it's all that important but... > > Stacy = guy > Stacey = girl > > -Mr. Stacy Young hehe ;-) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:47 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Improve FB3 website performance > > Nice! execution time is now 2800ms. I guess Stacy will be mad with me > because o do not trust her in the first place. I'm sorry Stacy, my > fault ;) > > Maybe if i cache some more queries and, run LorCat i could get this page > to run in about 1100ms, witch wont be good but will be fine for me. > > Thank you Barney. > > > >Application.cfm: > ><cfset request.starttime = gettickcount() /> > > > >OnRequestEnd.cfm: > ><cfoutput>Execution Time: #int(gettickcount() - > >request.starttime)#ms</cfoutput> > > > >That won't be exact, but within a handful of milliseconds. > > > >--- > >Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer > >AudienceCentral (formerly PIER System, Inc.) > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] voice : 360.756.8080 x12 > >fax : 360.647.5351 > > > >www.audiencecentral.com > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:01 AM > >> To: CF-Talk > >> Subject: Improve FB3 website performance > >> > >> > >> Stacy, how can i know the execution time with debuggin off? Yes, i've > > >> tried with debuggin of, i cant see much diference. > >> > >> I'm using an athlon xp 2.2 1gb ram ddr and hd 80gb 7200rpm. > >> Apparently, debug on or off does not make any diference. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> BP. > >> > >> >Have u *tried* it with debug off? Because on CFMX with FB sites the > >> >response time is unusually high. Sometimes upwards of 500-600ms for > the > >> >core file...but this disappears once debug is off. > >> > > >> >-Stace > >> > > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:35 PM > >> >To: CF-Talk > >> >Subject: Improve FB3 website performance > >> > > >> >a) Yes, they are. I guess the improvement will not make it go down > >> >4500ms =( > >> >b) Yes, your right on this, the cfmodule itself does not consume > much > >> >cpu load, there must be something in the logic our queries. > >> > > >> >Thank you Stacy. > >> > > >> > > >> >>a) Are these page times being recorded while CFMX has debug on? If > so, > >> >>response should be improved once it's off. > >> >>b) If all your module calls were as simple as setting a variable > you > >> >>wouldn't have this speed issue...meaning, I don't believe the > module > >> >>calls are the root cause of ur problem...while they do add > overhead, > >> >not > >> >>sure it's 6 secs worth. You've got logic somewhere eating cpu > cycles. > >> >> > >> >>-Stace > >> >> > >> >>-----Original Message----- > >> >>From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:27 AM > >> >>To: CF-Talk > >> >>Subject: Improve FB3 website performance > >> >> > >> >>I will try do to some query caching but i doubt the actual 6000+ms > >> >>execution time will drop to below 1000, witch is that i'm used. > >> >> > >> >>Thanks for your reply. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
