Ooopps, i'm sorry!! as you may guess, i'm not english or american (i'm brazilian) and english is not my primary language. Sorry for the confusion Mr. Stacy, that won't happend again =)
Best regards and thank you for your help in that subject. >Good to hear !! not that it's all that important but... > >Stacy = guy >Stacey = girl > >-Mr. Stacy Young hehe ;-) > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:47 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Improve FB3 website performance > >Nice! execution time is now 2800ms. I guess Stacy will be mad with me >because o do not trust her in the first place. I'm sorry Stacy, my >fault ;) > >Maybe if i cache some more queries and, run LorCat i could get this page >to run in about 1100ms, witch wont be good but will be fine for me. > >Thank you Barney. > > >>Application.cfm: >><cfset request.starttime = gettickcount() /> >> >>OnRequestEnd.cfm: >><cfoutput>Execution Time: #int(gettickcount() - >>request.starttime)#ms</cfoutput> >> >>That won't be exact, but within a handful of milliseconds. >> >>--- >>Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer >>AudienceCentral (formerly PIER System, Inc.) >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>voice : 360.756.8080 x12 >>fax : 360.647.5351 >> >>www.audiencecentral.com >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:01 AM >>> To: CF-Talk >>> Subject: Improve FB3 website performance >>> >>> >>> Stacy, how can i know the execution time with debuggin off? Yes, >>> i've tried with debuggin of, i cant see much diference. >>> >>> I'm using an athlon xp 2.2 1gb ram ddr and hd 80gb 7200rpm. >>> Apparently, debug on or off does not make any diference. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> BP. >>> >>> >Have u *tried* it with debug off? Because on CFMX with FB sites the >>> >response time is unusually high. Sometimes upwards of 500-600ms for >the >>> >core file...but this disappears once debug is off. >>> > >>> >-Stace >>> > >>> >-----Original Message----- >>> >From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:35 PM >>> >To: CF-Talk >>> >Subject: Improve FB3 website performance >>> > >>> >a) Yes, they are. I guess the improvement will not make it go down >>> >4500ms =( >>> >b) Yes, your right on this, the cfmodule itself does not consume >much >>> >cpu load, there must be something in the logic our queries. >>> > >>> >Thank you Stacy. >>> > >>> > >>> >>a) Are these page times being recorded while CFMX has debug on? If >so, >>> >>response should be improved once it's off. >>> >>b) If all your module calls were as simple as setting a variable >you >>> >>wouldn't have this speed issue...meaning, I don't believe the >module >>> >>calls are the root cause of ur problem...while they do add >overhead, >>> >not >>> >>sure it's 6 secs worth. You've got logic somewhere eating cpu >cycles. >>> >> >>> >>-Stace >>> >> >>> >>-----Original Message----- >>> >>From: Python Python [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:27 AM >>> >>To: CF-Talk >>> >>Subject: Improve FB3 website performance >>> >> >>> >>I will try do to some query caching but i doubt the actual 6000+ms >>> >>execution time will drop to below 1000, witch is that i'm used. >>> >> >>> >>Thanks for your reply. >>> >> >>> > >>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
