> I agree. For hundreds of sites, nope. For a fewer number, > yes. I expect that we'll soon start seeing both offered, > depending on what you need (and what you'll pay for).
I don't know; it seems that there's little room for it to be a viable shared hosting solution. If you have the kind of machine that can handle it, you might be better off with true separation through virtualization - something along the lines of the VMware GSX and ESX server products. If not, you'd probably be better off with dedicated hosts. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
