On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:53 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote: > It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have found issues > with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I don't mean big honkin > amazon.com load, just medium level load.) Issues like:
"It does improve performance" is a bit of a blanket statement. It *may* improve performance depending on what your CFC does and how you use it. As for load issues, macromedia.com is heavily CFC-based and uses a lot of CFCs stored in server scope (we're the only application in town so we don't use application scope :) and we've never seen the sort of issues Ray has seen - even with tens of thousands of active concurrent users (we have 15,000-20,000 active sessions across six CFMX instances during morning peak load). I'm not saying Ray hasn't seen strange behavior, just pointing out that it isn't a *given* that you will see any such problems. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
