> > Right, which is really very low traffic - that's why I don't > think it's > a load issue per se (because we didn't hit any problems under much > higher load when we were using application scope - we changed > to server > scope for most things prior to deployment simply because server scope > access is marginally faster). > > Ray, have you had any success creating a reproducible test case for > this? Have you tried server scope and shown that the buggy behavior > does not occur? >
While I agree that the load I encountered was minimal, the odd thing is that I _was_ able to recreate it, but only using a load tool like MS WAST (is that the name) and the Apache one (can't remember it's name as well). As soon as I'd put the sites under load, the errors would show up. Now, these two tools did _real_ load, not the load I normally would get on cflib. Maybe the machine simply isn't that great. Server scope: Today was a holiday ya know. ;) I'm going to try, just later. -ray ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
