On Friday, Jul 4, 2003, at 22:03 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote: > While I agree that the load I encountered was minimal, the odd thing is > that I _was_ able to recreate it, but only using a load tool like MS > WAST (is that the name) and the Apache one (can't remember it's name as > well). As soon as I'd put the sites under load, the errors would show > up. Now, these two tools did _real_ load, not the load I normally would > get on cflib. Maybe the machine simply isn't that great.
Hmm, I don't know what to say. We used WAST (Web Application Stress Tool) and Segue's Silk Performer to generate outrageously high load without seeing these sorts of failures (the Apache tool is 'ab' - Apache Bench). We have really high load normally and don't see it. I'm intrigued. I can't imagine how or why such errors would occur - even under load - so I'll be really interested to see how this pans out... > Server scope: Today was a holiday ya know. ;) I'm going to try, just > later. Yeah, yeah... Like we've all really got better things to do when the office is shut? I'm on two week's vacation but I'm still messing with programs :) But right now I'll go back to my Anita Blake book (by Laurell K Hamilton)... Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
