> I seriously believe
> that Macromedia dropped the ball big time with the CFMX release...it
> wasn't ready.

I think it's fair to say that CFMX was released when it was it was to
coincide with the release of all the other -MX level applications. As
such, it's release date was dictated more by the pressures of getting a
product into the marketplace than it's production-worthiness.

I love CFMX. It's opened so many new doors to all CF developers -- it's
an amazing step forward. However, whilst appreciating that the product
under the hood was a complete rewrite, I personally feel there were too
many unresolved issues with the first release for it to have been
considered sufficiently ready.

Having said that, a director once said, "films are never finished, just
abandoned". The same is true of software and when you start discussing
whether something is ready or not, you're getting into the realms of a
discussion that can never be resolved.


-- 
Aidan Whitehall <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Macromedia ColdFusion Developer
Fairbanks Environmental Ltd  +44 (0)1695 51775
Queen's Awards Winner 2003 <http://www.fairbanks.co.uk/go/awards>

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to