You said, and I quote ... "any host who take the time to optimize for
google is probably not worth investigating." - that's what I based my
comment on.

That just seemed like a fairly outlandish statement to make and so I
expressed my opinion. I believe I'm entitled to that.

By the way, Rackspace is on the first page of Google when I search for
"dedicated windows hosting", I certainly wouldn't classify them as being
"not worth investigating" - although they're not in my price range.

Your opinions are yours and are equally as valid as mine and I think we
can ALL do without the hostillity.

Have a great day,

Joshua Miller
Head Programmer / IT Manager
Garrison Enterprises Inc.
www.garrisonenterprises.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(704) 569-0801 ext. 254
 
************************************************************************
*************
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender states them to be the views of 
Garrison Enterprises Inc.
 
This e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and contains information that is private and confidential. If
you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error please delete it immediately and
advise us by return e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
*************


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SOT: Looking for a VERY inexpensive dedicated development
server


I'd like to see where I said wanting to be found in google is a bad
thing...please show me. I got your diagram right here though.

If you disagree, and would like to buy from someone in the first 5
pages, go right ahead. I don't care...I don't see how it applies to the
topic though. I said I would start at page 5...not that you should. It
is a common strategy though. I was just offering my opinion, having been
in the hosting business for almost 5 years now considering that there is
probably thousands of hosters in the world the world that will do a
99-150 dedicated server of widely varying quality.

Personally..I'd drive over to the local isp with a server in hand and
ask if they would plug it in and try not to spill coffee in it. Don't
have a Venn diagram of why that would be a good idea though, so it may
not be valid in your world.

-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, July 10, 2003, 10:54:29 PM, you wrote:

JM> So wanting to be found in the world's most popular search engine 
JM> means you're a bad company? I'd like to see the Venn diagram for 
JM> that piece of logic.


JM> -----Original Message-----
JM> From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JM> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:39 PM
JM> To: CF-Talk
JM> Subject: Re: SOT: Looking for a VERY inexpensive dedicated
development
JM> server


JM> At 10:22 PM 7/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>page 5...any host who take the time to optimize for google is probably

>>not worth investigating.

JM> Huh? How can that be? We never "optimized for google", but we found
our 
JM> selfs listed there with a good ranking. How can that say anything
about
JM> us 
JM> as a company? I don't think thats fair at all. Also, google's link 
JM> popularity system may actually mean that some good/popular hosts DO
get
JM> a 
JM> high ranking at google.

JM> Brook


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to