Sandy >> >> So why rewrite the application in FuseQ? FuseQ will not be supported >> from >> this point forward as all of it is now available in Fusebox 4. If you >> are >> going to rewrite your application from FB3 to something anyways (and >> believe >> me to take advantage of content variables and the ability to link >> fuseactions together you do have to do a rewrite),
I wasn't aware that to take advantage of the chaining fuseactions together It would involve a lot more of a re-write. I wrongly had the impression from what little I have read on FuseQ that you could plug in the core file and start chaining fuseaction together. why not just do it in >> FB4? If you have MX a stable core is available now at beta.fusebox.org. >> If >> you have 5, go ahead and play with FuseQ, but know you will move it to >> FB4 >> as soon as the 5 core becomes available. Maybe. We'll see. Thanks anyway. Kola ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
