Brian Kotek wrote: >Performance in Fusebox 4 is almost 10 TIMES better than Fusebox 3. In >other words, a page that took 400 milliseconds to render in Fusebox 3 >takes about 40 milliseconds to render in production mode with Fusebox 4.
So what happens to all the folks who hitched up their wagons to FB3? Time for a free (i.e. unbillable) do-over? How does this reflect on the cost of implementing FB3, in retrospect? Will new-cause but similar-effect issues arise in FB4? I'm anxiously awaiting fb4's release as I very much want to give it a look. Standardization is good; disciplined code is good. Torpedoed performance and a limited lifespan after adoption is terrifying. -- ------------------------------------------- Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com ------------------------------------------- -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
